英语家园

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问移动社区

搜索

雷曼的交易对手和客户严防池鱼之灾

发布者: chrislau2001 | 发布时间: 2008-9-12 08:46| 查看数: 1977| 评论数: 1|

Lehman Counterparties, Clients Walking A Delicate Line



Trading counterparties and clients of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH) were treading a delicate line Wednesday, voicing support in the Wall Street investment bank, while also quietly looking to reduce some exposure to the firm in order to protect assets.

Across Wall Street, the consensus was that Lehman didn't have the sudden confidence problems that had overwhelmed Bear Stearns Cos. and pushed it into a fire sale in March. For many Lehman counterparties, however, there was an acknowledgment that they had to guard themselves as the firm's share price continues to fall, even as they wished to support Lehman and its employees.

On Wednesday, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER), Morgan Stanley (MS), Deutsche Bank AG (DB) and Credit Suisse Group (CS) said they continued to trade with Lehman. Large fixed-income money managers Pacific Investment Management Co. and BlackRock Inc. (BLK) also said they were doing business as usual with Lehman.

Chief on some traders' minds was Lehman's credit rating, which is in increasing danger of a downgrade as its shares continue to slump. Lehman's current ratings are already at the threshold of what most trading partners and clients will tolerate for an investment bank, at single-A.

The large U.S. rating services are all reviewing Lehman's credit ratings for downgrades, and if they are lowered, Lehman said it could have to post as much as $2.9 billion in collateral to its counterparties. Rating cuts may also force customers to move their business elsewhere.

Bear Stearns was brought down by an inability to access short-term debt financing markets. Lehman has more protection against that outcome, as it has access to Federal Reserve lending facilities opened after the Bear collapse.

But if mutual funds, hedge funds and other clients stop turning to Lehman for money management or trading help, it will be a further blow to Lehman's ability to drum up earnings, putting more pressure on the firm.

Daniel Dektar, a portfolio manager at Smith Breeden Associates Inc. in Chapel Hill, N.C., said his firm has minimum rating standards for all its counterparties.

If Lehman's rating is cut, Mr. Dektar said, 'we have to curtail our activities with them - some clients would require us to unwind positions with Lehman, and that's probably true for a lot of money managers.'

The decisions of hedge-fund clients - which borrow money and turn to brokers like Lehman for trading and lending assistance - aren't as essential to Lehman as they were to Bear. Less than 10% of Lehman's revenue has come from prime-brokerage services in recent years, according to Glenn Schorr, a UBS analyst, compared with about 20% for Bear Stearns before its difficulties earlier this year.

Yet the Bear Stearns drama continues to hang over decisions about Lehman. On some trading desks, talking about Lehman is forbidden as hedge-fund managers and other traders fear getting subpoenas from the Securities and Exchange Commission for spreading rumors, as has happened after Bear Stearns's fire sale. 'There's a chill around talking about it,' said one trader, who asked not to be identified.

In recent months, some hedge funds and other clients have been spreading around their prime-brokerage business so as not to concentrate all their counterparty risk in one place.

Some large hedge funds, including Renaissance Technologies Corp., pulled business from Lehman Brothers several months ago, worried about the firm's future. Others in recent days have asked that their trades be matched with a different bank, said one trading-firm executive who asked that his firm's name not be used.

Serena Ng / Gregory Zuckerman / Aaron Lucchetti

最新评论

chrislau2001 发表于 2008-9-12 08:46:22
雷曼兄弟控股公司(Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.)的交易对手及客户周三如履薄冰,他们一面表达对这家华尔街投行的支持,一面为了保护自身资产而试图悄悄减持与雷曼相关的头寸。

华尔街一致认为雷曼的投资者不会像贝尔斯登公司(Bear Stearns Cos.)的投资者那样一下子变得对它信心全无。市场信心的突然丧失令贝尔斯登轰然倒塌,今年3月不得不低价贱卖。不过对雷曼的许多交易对手来说,即便他们想助雷曼及其员工一臂之力,可面对雷曼股价的一跌再跌,他们其实也不得不进行自我保护了。

高盛集团(Goldman Sachs Group Inc.)、美林公司(Merrill Lynch & Co.)、摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)、德意志银行(Deutsche Bank AG)和瑞士信贷(Credit Suisse Group)周三表示,他们与雷曼的交易仍在继续。大型固定收入基金Pacific Investment Management Co.和贝莱德(BlackRock Inc.)也表示,他们仍和往常一样同雷曼开展交易。

在一些交易员头脑中挥之不去的是雷曼兄弟的信贷评级状况,眼看雷曼股价不断下挫,其信贷评级也面临着越来越大的下调风险。该公司目前的评级已经处于A,这也是多数交易伙伴和客户认为对于一家投行来说勉强可接受的评级。

美国大型评级机构如今全都在考虑是否下调雷曼的评级,而雷曼称如果其评级被下调,将不得不为交易对手提供高达29亿美元的担保。评级下调可能还会丢掉客户。

当初,贝尔斯登因无法进入短期债券融资市场而“毙命”,如今雷曼有更多的保护伞可以令其避免重蹈覆辙,美国联邦储备委员会(Fed)在贝尔斯登覆灭后开设的借贷窗口便是其中之一。

可如果共同基金、对冲基金还有其他客户不再与雷曼开展理财业务或是不再聘请它为交易顾问,那么这将再次打击雷曼重振业绩的能力,给该公司带来更大的压力。

北卡罗来纳州Smith Breeden Associates Inc.的投资组合经理丹尼尔•德克塔(Daniel Dektar)指出,他的公司对交易对手的信贷评级要求是最低的。

德克塔说,如果雷曼的评级被下调,我们会减少与它们的业务,有的客户还会要求我们解除同雷曼有关的头寸,这也许是很多基金经理都会有的举动。

而对冲基金这一客户群的决定对雷曼产生的影响就不及它对贝尔斯登的影响那么大了。瑞士银行(UBS)分析师格兰•斯科尔(Glenn Schorr)称,雷曼近年来机构经纪业务的收入仅占公司总收入的不足10%,而贝尔斯登在今年早些时候陷入困境前这一比例大约为20%。对冲基金筹集到资金后会转向雷曼这样的经纪公司,向它们征询交易及贷款建议。

不过贝尔斯登事件依然还是在人们做出有关雷曼的决定时萦绕心头。一些交易机构禁止讨论雷曼,因为对冲基金经理和其他交易员害怕因被说成散播谣言而接到美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的传票,就像贝尔斯登被贱卖后所发生的那样。一位不愿具名的交易员说,人们一谈到这些就不寒而栗。

近几个月来,有些对冲基金和其他客户一直忙于分散它们的机构经纪业务,以便平衡风险。

包括Renaissance Technologies Corp.在内的几家大型对冲基金几个月前出于对雷曼前景的担忧终止了与它的业务。一位不愿透露公司姓名的管理人员说,还有些基金最近几天也要求把业务转移至其他银行。

Serena Ng / Gregory Zuckerman / Aaron Lucchetti
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表